Dear Supporters,
Friends of the Sound of Jura is one of more than sixty organisations that have joined the Our Seas Coalition.
Our Seas believes that Scotland’s coastal waters are among the country’s most precious assets, and worth protecting. Our waters are extremely productive, rich in biodiversity and they can support many jobs in coastal communities if they are managed sustainably.
​
Some fishing methods damage life on the seabed, destroying nurseries for commercial fish, such as maerl beds, and harming rare seabed animals. The Scottish Government has identified 11 of these Priority Marine Features (PMF) species and habitats that are most at risk from bottom-contacting fishing (scallop dredging and prawn trawling).
In 2017, a scallop dredger devastated a bed of rare flameshells in Loch Carron.
​
Despite this being one of the best examples of this PMF, the flameshell bed was not legally protected. After a public outcry, the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for the Environment set up an emergency Marine Protected Area, within which it is hoped that the flameshells will gradually recover. She also promised to review the protection given to PMFs from scallop dredging and prawn trawling. This review was launched in 2018 but nothing has come of it so far and the Government’s ambition to protect these PMFs seems to have dwindled almost to nothing. The only tangible action is that trials have started of tracking devices on the smaller scallop dredgers, which would show where the boats are, without being admissible as evidence in court, if the boats are fishing illegally in protected areas.
​
We fear that these devices will be used to claim that PMFs can now be avoided very precisely, so the few areas where this type of fishing is not allowed, such as parts of the Loch Sunart to the Sound of Jura Marine Protected Area, might be opened up to dredging, with just small exclusions around the known PMF locations. Records of PMFs are far from complete and the unknown ones will be at risk.
Although the Government has designated 20% of our seas as Marine Protected Areas, boats using bottom-contacting methods are allowed to continued scraping 95% of Scotland’s seabed, and some boats illegally fish the remaining 5%, where they are banned. Marine Scotland Compliance seems unable to enforce the law.
​
The Scottish Government has control over the management of our inshore area within 12 nautical miles. Its agency, Marine Scotland, is obliged to follow Scotland’s National Marine Plan (NMP) and the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010, which require it to put fisheries on a sustainable footing. The National Performance Framework also commits the Scottish Government,
​
“by 2020 [to] effectively regulate harvesting and end over-fishing … and unregulated fishing and destructive fishing practices and implement science-based plans, in order to restore fish stocks in the shortest time feasible, at least to levels that can produce sustainable yield as determined by their biological characteristics”.
​
The Government has also committed to promote local, small-scale and sustainable fisheries, robust measures to protect vulnerable stocks, and “mechanisms for managing conflicts between fishermen” (Policy FISHERIES 1), so as to manage fisheries in the long-term public interest. Its marine planners must also identify marine carbon sinks and seek to avoid the “Colocaton of damaging activity”. Dredging disturbs the ability of seabed sediments to store carbon.
​
None of these obligations are being met by our Government. In fact, the Scottish Government has failed to meet 11 of the 15 indicators it uses to measure Good Environmental Status, allowing our marine environment to decline.
​
The longer Ministers stall, the more seabed habitats we lose and the harder it becomes for them and the species that rely on them to recover.
​
Our seas are a public asset and potential resource; they must be managed in a way that restores lost marine life and degraded fish stocks, and recovers the marine environment, so it can provide for us all into the future. To restore public confidence, Ministers must be guided by science and policy. We need urgent action to stop further destruction and improve the resilience of our seas.
​
So, what can be done to preserve what’s left and allow recovery?
​
The degradation can still be reversed. If we protect the seabed it will recover. If we take action, environmental and economic benefits will flow.
​
This European Environment Agency report, Marine Messages, states it clearly:
​
"Solutions for halting the loss of marine biodiversity and starting to restore ecosystem resilience, while allowing for the sustainable use of Europe's seas, are obvious and available. They just need to be implemented.”
​
But that is not happening in Scotland.
​
In the absence of any progress to protect and restore Scotland’s seabed habitats and animals, and with the laws on illegal fishing going unenforced, Our Seas calls on First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and the Scottish Government to implement their own policies and stop the chronic destruction of our seabed.
​
Reinstating a coastal limit on bottom-trawl and dredge fishing seems to be the only way for this to be enforceable, so Our Seas calls for the Scottish Government to act urgently on this.
​
Our Seas is campaigning to Bring Back the Fish - Bring Back Scotland's #InshoreLimit
Please help this to happen by signing and sharing the Our Seas petition here
Please join us in supporting this petition:-
https://ourseasscotland.eaction.org.uk/bring-back-the-fish
Friends of the Sound of Jura have recently added their name to support a Global Call for the United Nations Human Rights Council to recognise without delay the human right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment.
In this time of climate emergency and COVID-19 crisis, we have come together as civil society organizations, social movements, local communities, and Indigenous Peoples to address the attached letter, calling on the United Nations Human Rights Council to recognize without delay the human right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. We respectfully ask you to join with us, support this call, and share it with other organizations that might be interested in joining this call.
Details can be found on the following link:
bit.ly/Right2Environment_SignOn
Friends of the Sound of Jura
www.friendsofthesoundofjura.org.uk
Community Group Member of
The Coastal Communities Network, Scotland
Friends of the Sound of Jura is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation: SC049740
​
​
Dear Supporters,
Friends of the Sound of Jura is one of more than sixty organisations that have joined the Our Seas Coalition.
Our Seas believes that Scotland’s coastal waters are among the country’s most precious assets, and worth protecting. Our waters are extremely productive, rich in biodiversity and they can support many jobs in coastal communities if they are managed sustainably.
​
Some fishing methods damage life on the seabed, destroying nurseries for commercial fish, such as maerl beds, and harming rare seabed animals. The Scottish Government has identified 11 of these Priority Marine Features (PMF) species and habitats that are most at risk from bottom-contacting fishing (scallop dredging and prawn trawling).
In 2017, a scallop dredger devastated a bed of rare flameshells in Loch Carron.
​
Despite this being one of the best examples of this PMF, the flameshell bed was not legally protected. After a public outcry, the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for the Environment set up an emergency Marine Protected Area, within which it is hoped that the flameshells will gradually recover. She also promised to review the protection given to PMFs from scallop dredging and prawn trawling. This review was launched in 2018 but nothing has come of it so far and the Government’s ambition to protect these PMFs seems to have dwindled almost to nothing. The only tangible action is that trials have started of tracking devices on the smaller scallop dredgers, which would show where the boats are, without being admissible as evidence in court, if the boats are fishing illegally in protected areas.
​
We fear that these devices will be used to claim that PMFs can now be avoided very precisely, so the few areas where this type of fishing is not allowed, such as parts of the Loch Sunart to the Sound of Jura Marine Protected Area, might be opened up to dredging, with just small exclusions around the known PMF locations. Records of PMFs are far from complete and the unknown ones will be at risk.
Although the Government has designated 20% of our seas as Marine Protected Areas, boats using bottom-contacting methods are allowed to continued scraping 95% of Scotland’s seabed, and some boats illegally fish the remaining 5%, where they are banned. Marine Scotland Compliance seems unable to enforce the law.
​
The Scottish Government has control over the management of our inshore area within 12 nautical miles. Its agency, Marine Scotland, is obliged to follow Scotland’s National Marine Plan (NMP) and the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010, which require it to put fisheries on a sustainable footing. The National Performance Framework also commits the Scottish Government,
​
“by 2020 [to] effectively regulate harvesting and end over-fishing … and unregulated fishing and destructive fishing practices and implement science-based plans, in order to restore fish stocks in the shortest time feasible, at least to levels that can produce sustainable yield as determined by their biological characteristics”.
​
The Government has also committed to promote local, small-scale and sustainable fisheries, robust measures to protect vulnerable stocks, and “mechanisms for managing conflicts between fishermen” (Policy FISHERIES 1), so as to manage fisheries in the long-term public interest. Its marine planners must also identify marine carbon sinks and seek to avoid the “Colocaton of damaging activity”. Dredging disturbs the ability of seabed sediments to store carbon.
​
None of these obligations are being met by our Government. In fact, the Scottish Government has failed to meet 11 of the 15 indicators it uses to measure Good Environmental Status, allowing our marine environment to decline.
​
The longer Ministers stall, the more seabed habitats we lose and the harder it becomes for them and the species that rely on them to recover.
​
Our seas are a public asset and potential resource; they must be managed in a way that restores lost marine life and degraded fish stocks, and recovers the marine environment, so it can provide for us all into the future. To restore public confidence, Ministers must be guided by science and policy. We need urgent action to stop further destruction and improve the resilience of our seas.
​
So, what can be done to preserve what’s left and allow recovery?
​
The degradation can still be reversed. If we protect the seabed it will recover. If we take action, environmental and economic benefits will flow.
​
This European Environment Agency report, Marine Messages, states it clearly:
​
"Solutions for halting the loss of marine biodiversity and starting to restore ecosystem resilience, while allowing for the sustainable use of Europe's seas, are obvious and available. They just need to be implemented.”
​
But that is not happening in Scotland.
​
In the absence of any progress to protect and restore Scotland’s seabed habitats and animals, and with the laws on illegal fishing going unenforced, Our Seas calls on First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and the Scottish Government to implement their own policies and stop the chronic destruction of our seabed.
​
Reinstating a coastal limit on bottom-trawl and dredge fishing seems to be the only way for this to be enforceable, so Our Seas calls for the Scottish Government to act urgently on this.
​
Our Seas is campaigning to Bring Back the Fish - Bring Back Scotland's #InshoreLimit
Please help this to happen by signing and sharing the Our Seas petition here
Please join us in supporting this petition:-
https://ourseasscotland.eaction.org.uk/bring-back-the-fish
Friends of the Sound of Jura have recently added their name to support a Global Call for the United Nations Human Rights Council to recognise without delay the human right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment.
In this time of climate emergency and COVID-19 crisis, we have come together as civil society organizations, social movements, local communities, and Indigenous Peoples to address the attached letter, calling on the United Nations Human Rights Council to recognize without delay the human right to a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. We respectfully ask you to join with us, support this call, and share it with other organizations that might be interested in joining this call.
Details can be found on the following link:
bit.ly/Right2Environment_SignOn
Friends of the Sound of Jura
www.friendsofthesoundofjura.org.uk
Community Group Member of
The Coastal Communities Network, Scotland
Friends of the Sound of Jura is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation: SC049740
​
​
Newsletters
Home > Newsletters > Newsletter No6
Newsletter No6 22 June 2017
Evening Event - 16th July in Tayvallich
For the latest news please come to Tayvallich Village Hall on 16th July at 7:30pm.
Underwater photographer Mark Woombs is going to show us the wonders of the Loch Sunart to Sound of Jura Marine Protected Area and John Aitchison will sum up the situation regarding Dounie and suggest what else the Friends of the Sound of Jura might do to make the most of having the MPA on our doorsteps.There will also be outstanding cakes from Cake-away!
​
Entrance is free.
Dounie's SEPA CAR License Application and Sea Fans
SEPA are still considering the Dounie application from Kames Fish Farming. They say they received around 80 representations about this and will probably take until October to respond.
​
In the meantime they have requested that Kames perform another biological survey of the seabed because the one they submitted did not identify rare northern sea fans (despite one being clearly visible in still frames from the video submitted to SEPA). The deadline for this is in mid-August.
Northern sea fans are classed as Priority Marine Features by Scottish Natural Heritage and they warrant protection for that reason.
While we wait for this process to take its course we are organizing our own diver survey of the bay to map the sea fans independently.
Press Coverage
There has been quite a bit of press interest since the last update.
​
For more information please see the Dounie facebook page https://www.facebook.com/friendsofthesoundofjura/
and website https://www.friendsofthesoundofjura.org.uk
We have a Twitter account too https://twitter.com/TheSoundOfJura
​
If SEPA approve the license and Kames apply for planning permission we will push hard for more press coverage.
Looking Ahead
With the Scottish Government aiming to double aquaculture production by 2030 and A&B saying fish farming 'is one of the key industries identified by the Council to assist in the strategy to stem depopulation, the Council's number one priority', Dounie is unlikely to be the last proposal for a fish farm in the Sound of Jura, so it makes sense to look ahead and to get involved in how these decisions are made.
​
For that reason some of us recently took part in a workshop in Glasgow (part of the Marine Ecosystems Research Programme, run by SAMS in Oban and Plymouth Marine Laboratory) to try to learn more about marine planning and to make sure that the opinions of coastal communities as well as developers are heard. The same study will include a film, showing various opinions about uses of the sea. Dougie was interviewed for it last week.
This week a different group met another researcher from SAMS, working on an EU-funded study of social limits to the expansion of fish farming. We explained our community's position and will now be included in her study.
​
One of its likely conclusions is that there is little point pushing for fish farms where communities do not want them and while other communities are keen to have them. Whether this will affect the Dounie decision is not yet clear.
The Inadequacies of Planning Permission
One outcome of these meetings is that it is clear that the council's planning process is not suited to deciding about fish farm permissions. The council themselves acknowledge this. The Planning Committee is not allowed to consider the cumulative effect of other existing fish farms, it has to give permission forever and it has no way to control what happens if there's a subsequent problem caused by the fish farm, for instance if an infestation of sea lice affects wild salmon and sea trout, as is likely at Dounie and elsewhere. The council are aware that they have signed up (as have all public bodies) to having a duty to preserve biodiversity. That includes protecting wild sea trout and salmon. They know they are vulnerable to being sued for failure to do this and so are the government agencies which also fail in this respect. The agencies find it hard to account for the effects of fish farming on the wild fish because they spend part of their lives in freshwater as well as in the sea. No-one seems to want to take responsibility for them, particularly as the evidence has mounted for their decline being mainly caused by fish farming. Strangely it is Marine Scotland rather than SNH that has the most responsibility for wild salmon and sea trout, and the council have the final say.
The Emamectin Benzoate Scandal
The press have revealed a string of failures and bad behavior by some of those with a vested interest in expanding salmon farming. The Sunday Herald in particular has uncovered an attempt to bury the results of a study that appears to show that widespread harm is done to crustacea, including crabs, lobsters and prawns, on a scale of whole sea lochs. The study attributes this to the chemical emamectin benzoate, widely fed to salmon to combat sea lice. This study was published online and without any publicity, only after until it had been 'wrapped' in another document containing the critical views of five anonymous reviewers who pointed out its flaws. Freedom of Information requests have since revealed that four of these reviewers work for the American company that manufactures the pesticide fed to the fish.
​
SEPA and a few other 'lone voices' on the board of the government-funded body that commissioned this research objected to this in private emails, but the board decided it was right to maintain the reviewers' anonymity. The fifth reviewer was appointed by the same board.
With revelations of this type it is hard to trust much that the government or its agencies tell us about the safety of the chemicals licensed for use in salmon farms. Much of the monitoring of their use and impact is done by the fish farm companies themselves.
When the first of these revelations was made, SEPA acted, belatedly, on the study's findings. In a letter to salmon farming companies, which we requested to see under FoI laws, they have somewhat reduced the dosing regime for existing licensed salmon farms. Fish farms also now have to let SEPA know when the pesticide is going to be used and (vaguely) they have to do 'biological monitoring'.
​
This falls far short of the outright ban that SEPA discussed in private last year with the Scottish Salmon Producers' Organisation, and which they quietly dropped after lobbying from the industry.
It remains to be seen whether the reduced dosage will affect how many fish could be kept at Dounie, and whether this will change the economic viability of the farm. It is clear though that salmon farms are not inspected very often and, once licensed, unscrupulous operators could increase the dose without much fear of being caught.
Rising Sea Lice
Emamectin benzoate is used to treat salmon infested by sea lice. Even the world's largest salmon farming company, Marine Harvest, acknowledges that these parasites are proving hard to control in Scotland, compared to other countries. This graph comes from their 2016 Annual Report.
Kames describe Marine Harvest as their 'backers' for the Dounie proposal.
In Norway Marine Harvest seems to have acknowledged this problem, and the enormous losses it is making due to sea lice, by saying that it plans to replace open net salmon farms there with closed containment pens. Sea lice can be filtered out and won't reach the caged fish, so the impact of masses of lice on wild fish should be reduced. It is not clear whether the organic waste from the pens and any chemical treatments will still be discharged into the sea. Closed farms at sea will still have a substantial impact on the landscape and access to existing moorings etc, unless they are sited far from shore.
Council Planning Committee
All three mid-Argyll councilors were re-elected in the recent council elections.
Donnie MacMillan and Sandy Taylor are still on the planning committee which comprises 15 members.